
Ferry views
Margie Currie
Talk of a Campbeltown/Arran/Ardrossan service as I understand might be seasonal and possibly thrice weekly. Brodick would be the Arran port. There is a lobby in Ardrossan who would welcome greater use of the port facility there. The interest in Arran appears to be a bit lukewarm. Obviously another service is welcome but, perhaps it has been less wholeheartedly received in case it would be perceived to threaten the viability of Locranza/ Clainoig/Tarbert service for which there is very strong support. I think that this fear is unfounded. The C/B/A service would be less likely to receive subsidy than the "lifeline" services which are the object of the Ferries Review.
Linda Johnston, Group Director, Auchrannie
A summary follows, but to see Linda’s comprehensive report, click here.
It is great news that RET will be extended to Arran but extremely disappointing and worrying that the pilot scheme will not be implemented until 2014, especially as the scheme is being extended to Islay, Colonsay and Gigha in October 2012. This puts Arran at a severe disadvantage. We suffered a downturn in tourism income in 2010 when tourism income fell 6% from £30.4m to £28.59m, and in 2011 Cal Mac’s carrying figures were down by 5.93% for passengers and 5.77% for cars. By 2014, Arran’s economy will most likely be severely affected. We believe that visitors will bypass Arran and visit other islands with cheaper fares, thus accelerating Arran’s economic decline.
A solution to the problems with Ardrossan Harbour must be found This year, Auchrannie has suffered the loss of 96 room nights due to ferry cancellation against 19 room nights in 2010/11. Guests stranded on either side of the water are put off visiting Arran in the future.
The proposals set out in the Scottish Ferry Services Draft Plan would bring a vast improvement to the Arran service, leading to greater tourist numbers. Continuation of the Lochranza – Claonaig service is essential to encourage through traffic from Arran to Kintyre and to utilise partnership opportunities with these areas.
Katy Clark MP
Whilst there are some welcome proposals in the draft Plan that will affect Arran, particularly for increased sailing times, I am concerned that the Government has not ruled out the possibility that this review will lead to the privatisation of more profitable routes, including Ardrossan to Brodick.
In addition, island communities have been waiting for the SNP Government to publish its policy statement on their procurement strategy for new ferries. We were lately informed that this statement will be made in April, just after the current consultation closes. This is significant because the ferry fleet is ageing and will need to be replaced over the coming years, which the Government has estimated will cost between £509m and £604m.
This lack of information also casts a shadow over the proposal to replace the existing vessel on the Ardrossan to Brodick route with two smaller ones, which would enable a shuttle service to operate between Arran and the mainland. Whilst this could be a positive development, the prospect remains of the Scottish taxpayer funding the purchase of the new vessels and the route being sold off to the private sector on the cheap shortly afterwards.
I also have some reservations over the potential impact two smaller vessels might have on the number of cancelled journeys on the route. We already see too many cancellations in periods of adverse weather and I would want guarantees that any change in the ferries used on the Ardrossan Brodick route would reduce rather than increase the annual number of cancellations.
It is also very important that the Lochranza to Claonaig route is protected during this process. I am hopeful that journeys between Lochranza and Claonaig will increase as a result of Transport Scotland’s review, although I note that the draft Plan only commits to review the Lochranza to Claonaig service in the event of increased journeys between Ardrossan and Brodick.
Elsewhere, the suggested new route to Campbeltown is welcome, both for the transportation of goods and passengers wishing to travel between Arran and Argyll. I strongly believe, however, that this new service should be an additional rather than a replacement route.
We should look to this review to cement the position of CalMac as the provider of lifeline ferry services to Arran, as well as the numerous communities living on Clyde and Hebridean and Northern Isles ferry routes. The public sector is doing an excellent job in providing this vital form of public transport and it is well supported by local people, with high levels of customer satisfaction regularly recorded.
I am sure that Arran residents will have ideas of their own about how services to and from the island can be improved. I very much hope that Transport Scotland keeps an open mind about their proposals and that they are willing to incorporate suggestions that will benefit Arran.
Crofters
The Scottish Crofting Federation (SCF) feels that the ferry review displays a ‘lamentable lack of understanding of the geography’ of the west Highlands and Islands and threatens ‘blow after economic blow’ to fragile communities. The SCF’s Crofting Resources Programme manager, Donald Murdie, is worried that the Government is to ‘review’ the status of the route between Mull and Lochaline on the basis that it is merely ‘a secondary service’ to the one between Mull and Oban. He says, ‘If these services are lost, the only link for vehicles between Ardnamurchan and Mull will be via Oban, which of course involves a second ferry crossing at Corran. This would be particularly damaging for crofting, as the abattoir serving Ardnamurchan is in Mull. Equally Mull would be deprived of its links to the north.’ Mr Murdie adds, ‘The ferry review exercise appears to be … an Edinburgh-centred view which shows no understanding of the importance of interconnectivity between communities within the Highlands and Islands.’
Arran Community Council
The Community Council, too, supplied a full report (click here). A summary follows.
The omission of the Ardrossan port from the draft review is deplored. Since the facility is owned by Clydeport, no development plans for it are included, and we demand that the final plan should address this in detail.
Road Equivalent Tariff (RET) will be welcomed on both Arran routes. Extending the scope of the trial scheme to include 6 metre length commercial vehicles will be welcomed by small businesses. Any deviation from RET as a uniform basis for fare setting must be totally transparent and not be used to indirectly increase the revenues from the route. Statistics on traffic volumes should be
made available. Block bookings by road hauliers should be reviewed, since short-notice cancellation restricts passenger car traffic. We welcome the HGV proposals and the proposal to
include coaches in the RET fares scheme. We ask that fares should be adjusted to facilitate travel to and from education and sporting events where ferry travel is the only transport choice. This should be available to all students in full time education rather than expire at age 18.
We strongly support the proposal to run a two-vessel service on an extended schedule , but stress that the ferry schedules should be integrated with the rail and bus connections in linked onward travel.
Before the final layout plans are submitted for upgrades to the Brodick facilities, we ask that the
design elements of future vessels are also considered to ensure compatibility from the
start.
Each route should have a designated alternative destination in bad weather, to ensure that a basic Lifeline service is maintained. We strongly refute the draft plan view that the Lochranza-Claonaig route “largely fulfils a specialist function”. Dangerous goods carriers currently use this route but it also provides a valuable service for both commercial and residential users, and an essential lifeline alternative if the Brodick / Ardrossan ferry is unable to sail. The farming community relies on this route for transporting stock to markets in Oban or beyond. The alternative road journey would exceed 100 miles. The Lochranza route is a critical stage in the tourist routes from mainland Ayrshire through Arran and onto
Argyll and the Western Isles, and is fundamental to the “whisky trail” and “hopscotch” routes. It is essential that the winter ferry from Tarbert to Lochranza should run twice daily during winter months, as few people will leave the island without a return facility. Improved service on this route will increase traffic volumes.
Current methods of enabling users to engage with the providers in service matters are not effective.
The importance of these consultative features and how the ferry services willintegrate with the other transport services must be clearly defined, to ensure that the service is “Fit for Purpose”.
ARTICLE FOR ARRAN by George Lyon. Liberal Democrat MEP for Scotland
For too long, ferries have been treated like a political football, kicked around from one party to another in the hope of scoring some points with island communities.
Born and brought up on the Isle of Bute, I know that this kind of behaviour does not serve the best interests of islanders.
I understand the importance of ferries to our island communities and the vital role they play in driving investment as well as maintaining vital links with the mainland.
Our ferries are our lifeline and must be protected. That is why I have been so critical of the SNP Government’s handling of our ferry services.
Just like many of you, I was surprised to learn that the SNP Government has taken the decision to expand the Road Equivalent Tariff (RET) to a handful of routes, whilst handing everyone else an inflation busting 6.5% ferry fare increase for passengers.
I believe that this decision is a tax on the majority of islands to pay for benefits for the select few. These changes are discriminatory and deeply unfair. Therefore, I have asked the EU competition authorities to investigate the actions of the SNP Government.
I have also been concerned about the proposed cancellation of Clonaig to Lochranza link. It beggars belief that the SNP Government are proposing to drop it in favour of a service to Campbeltown.
This route is the only way in for dangerous cargo such as oil and gas to make it to the islands. It is also a valuable ferry service for attracting tourists from Argyll by giving them the opportunity to hop over to Arran for a couple of days on the way home to the mainland.
Like the inflation busting increase to fares, removing this ferry service would cause real damage to the economy of the islands. I know there is a great deal of local concern at the prospect of losing this route, but it is time we made the SNP Government aware of the strength of feeling and ask them to back off and think again.
To show the SNP Government that their outrageous fare increase and the axing of vital services is pitting island against island, I have started a campaign that seeks to secure fair treatment of all island communities in Scotland. You can join the campaign by visiting my website www.georgelyon.org.uk
Ferries have been a political football for too long. It is time that we took a step back and worked towards solutions that serve all islanders equally and protect the communities that rely on these vital links, instead of pitting one against another.
John Bruce – SNP candidate for Arran in NAC election
Over the last 4-5 years we in Arran SNP have been very proactive in our suggestions to the Scottish Government, both directly through our own MSP Kenneth Gibson, and through individual contact with the Transport Minister. We also contributed to the 2010 consultation process.
My own views are strongly influenced by experience and use of ferries throughout Scandinavia. When a Norwegian friend came to Arran and saw the timetable, she asked, ‘Do they not want people to live here? For goodness sake, Arran is effectively closed at 6pm!’
It would never happen in Norway. There the ferries are ‘bridges’ between communities and operate from early morning to late (sometimes very late) in the evenings. This is exactly what is required on Arran from the presently state-owned, state-subsidised ferry service.
The entire social and economic wellbeing of Arran is determined by the ferry service.
- We need a thriving, growing population base;
- We need to attract young families, thus increasing school rolls;
- We need money spent mostly on Arran, benefiting local enterprise, sustaining jobs and helping to maintain and improve our basic infrastructure.
- We need a ferry timetable fit for purpose which allows the possibility of a permanent home on the island while holding on to a mainland job.
When my wife and I were both in teaching posts on the mainland, we retained our family home in Corrie but because of the ferry timetable were compelled to live off-island during the working week. I calculated that, over the 11-year period, at a conservative estimate, over £100,000 was spent on the mainland and not on the island.
In my view, the essentials are as follows:
- Early boat ex-Brodick for commuters (6 a.m. my preference)
- Late boat ex Ardrossan (12 midnight)
- Sunday service ditto







